Quote:
Originally Posted by kevin2323
Your in denial. There is a reason why it is priced at 50+ because it is the overall package. IT beats the camaro in 0-60 , twisties, and every other category but looks(which is different with everyone). The embarrassment is you even trying to compare the camaro to the m3. Just because the camaro will be within .4 of the m3s 0-60 doesnt mean the m3 is an embarrassment. The embarrassment is deluded camaro fans that swear by IRS and that with 20k in mods it will own the m3 on the track. Plain and simple it won't. IMO. I guess since my challenger will have IRS it will be an amazing track car. All the IRS does is make our straight line cars not spin out everytime we take a turn on the track lol. It isnt going to pave the way for a track car IMO.
|
The Camaro had a similiar lap time on the 'Ring as a Porsche Cayman S. Which was within 7 seconds of the M3. dont waste my time. The IRS isnt the only reason the Camaro is a great track car. its the whole package. yes your Chally has IRS, but thats a PERFECT example of a big, bulky, unathletic car that has some nice toys to play with, but nothing substantial.
IRS, 425 hp, thats good fun and all, but its built on a sedan platform and weighs more than 4100lbs. not exactly great track material.
within .4 seconds? hahaha. the M3 is SLOWER to 60, not .4 faster.
The Camaro does 0-60 in 4.6-4.8, and likely faster by the time it is released. the M3 does it 4.7-5.3
again... dont waste my time. the people that tell you they record 4.1 0-60 times with an M3 are wasting your time.