View Single Post
Old 04-08-2026, 01:07 PM   #61
ItsChristianInHD

 
ItsChristianInHD's Avatar
 
Drives: 2017 Camaro 2LT RS 3.6L
Join Date: Mar 2016
Location: Orange Park, Florida
Posts: 1,385
Quote:
Originally Posted by Malbjey View Post
Very much disagree here. People would have absolutely opted for blind spot monitoring (especially with the car's compromised visibility) and heated/cooled seats on the LT1.


If anything, the extra performance upgrades (extra cooling, bigger rear brakes, etc) from the SS models is what people don't need if they are buying the car for the streets and drag strip.


Most Camaro buyers aren't tracking the car where they even need the extra cooling or extra braking power. You don't even need that stuff for Autocross.


People shouldn't have to pay 5K+ more for an SS2, when GM could have offered the convenience features as an option on the LT1. GM got greedy.


And again, the price to add those features for the I4 and V6 cars was nowhere near as large.
I do agree they should have had a proper answer to the Mustang GT Premium without the performance pack. A true sports car daily driver friendly V8 that has all the creature comforts and tech but without being the track car.
__________________
2017 2LT RS 3.6L A8.
ItsChristianInHD is offline   Reply With Quote