Quote:
Originally Posted by ariZona28
Nothing "horrible" about my comparison. LOL! You possibly have a broader definition of muscle car than I do. I don't consider a 4-door, wrong-wheel drive vehicle a muscle car. Sport touring sedan or some other euphemism maybe. And as a side note your Malibu perspective is possibly what could occur to the Camaro nameplate if it's attached to cars that are more pedestrian in nature.
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mr_Draco
Again, you are doing an apples to watermelons comparison. You are trying to compare a late 60's Malibu to a modern Impala then do same thing. Compare a late 60's Impala to a modern Malibu. And yes, your comparison is absolutely horrendous.
|
These points are moot, as it's likely that GM isn't interested in what older consumers consider a "muscle car". I suspect the term isn't even being mentioned, and
if it is, it's an evolution or reinterpretation of what a muscle car
used to be.
It's in the past, so let it go.
