Thread: chrysler
View Single Post
Old 11-05-2009, 01:20 PM   #45
kevin2323


 
Drives: challenger
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: miami
Posts: 2,338
Quote:
Originally Posted by FenwickHockey65 View Post
Again, Chrysler doesn't need a low-volume car. They need a competent lineup. The Sebring and Avenger are jokes compared to the Malibu and Fusion. The money Chrysler burned developing the Challenger should've gone towards building a midsize sedan or compact, both of which would've generated much higher sales than a low-volume halo car. Chrysler also needs something to go up against the Equinox and Terrain, something to go up against the Lambdas, a full size SUV...the list goes on and on.

If Chrysler doesn't get their act together soon, GM and Ford will continue to eat up their market share until Chrysler is reduced to nothingness.
i could say the same thing about the development of the camaro, i understand your point on why they dont need the challenger....but they also dont need it shelved since its a low volume car, it doesnt affect them in a major way.
kevin2323 is offline   Reply With Quote