[arpad_m]

Originally Posted by gtfoxy

I have yet to dig into the sampling rate, but with what I know of HPT if you logged every PID available the sample rate, I would guess, would be slower if for no other reason than CAN Bus speed & extrapolation. It automatically, from my understanding, pulls data from every module, not just the ECM. That in and of itself is soooo much information it’s mind boggling. Come on, down to strut dampening & even relative ride height, that is high end Datalogging right there.

Not disagreeing at all, it's just so funny to read this when 10-20-40 Gbit Ethernet is the norm outside the automotive world. That means forty. billion. bits. per. second. Those few (say, maybe 50 to 100) modules in a car communicating minuscule packets of commands, performance data and status info at, say, 100fps (10 ms), which is the best I've seen, should be a drop in the ocean

I know, this is somewhat unfair, one probably can't have these data rates at 100% reliability and a reasonably low cost level, but still, the difference is 3 to 5 orders of magnitude.