Quote:
Originally Posted by Speedy1975
I'd say that car was a little under rated then. That's only a 12% drive train loss which I'd say neigh impossible.
540 - 475.73 = 64.27
64.27 / 540 = .1190
.1199 x 100 = 11.90%
17% is the number I usually use on a manual car for drive train losses.
Have you looked around the net to see how yours compares to others?
I test drove a 2010 Mustang GT yesterday up at Alexander Ford just for kicks. It felt way under powered compared to my Challenger R/T. I'd like to try to test drive a GT500 to compare.
|
What would it put out at the crank given the dyno he had with a 17% drivetrain loss?