I agree that they should have left the tail lights alone and instead worked on the interior. Its also good for Dodge that they stepped up the power on the engine, have they done anything about its fuel economy though?
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tomash
It's still fugly :(
I would never call it "Charger". It's just some joke. Chrysler FAILs.
Why couldn't they do a new gen so beautiful and respecting own heritage like Challenger?
|
Its much more deserving of the name charger than the ones from the 80's are, at least its a large rear drive V8. The styling has grown on me too