View Single Post
Old 05-30-2019, 10:52 PM   #16
KMPrenger


 
KMPrenger's Avatar
 
Drives: 16 Camaro SS, 15 Colorado
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Jefferson City, Missouri
Posts: 13,969
Quote:
Originally Posted by FenwickHockey65 View Post



Found it.
Yeah... Us midsize owners would welcome that engine with open arms. I mean, I love the 3.6 V6, but if your gonna give me 320 HP and nearly 350tq in a Colorado or Canyon, bring it on. I can't see them not using this engine in the midsize trucks eventually... Then again... It makes too much sense, so probably not.

Now back to the subject here. So my first impression is that I thought they looked decent. I'd have liked to see maybe a bit more aggression in the look, but whatever. Then I read the power estimates. This is just wrong. It's a friggin V. It's supposed to make the masses tremble in fear. I'm sure there cars are fun to drive and get moving pretty good, but a V they are not. More naming confusion BS from GM. If they thought the V Sport was a confusing name and to close to V, them they should have just gave them a different naming scheme... Not crapped on what a V has always represented. I don't care if there are higher performance models coming.

Now, I wonder if the next gen Camaro will be more the size of ct4 or ct5. If guess 5.
__________________
2016 Camaro 1SS - 8-speed - NPP - Black bowties
2010 Camaro 1LT V6 (Sold. I will miss her!)
KMPrenger is offline   Reply With Quote