Quote:
Originally Posted by Zeus
LSU is a good team, a lot more athletic than anyone in the big 12.
I agree with you 100%. I still think Tebow should Not Play. Three reasons....
1. (The big one) HE's not going to be 100%!!! If he gets into that game it will be because he passed a test less than 24 hours before hand. He shouldn't be in that game playing his style of football or we could loose him for the season.
2. We can win without him!!!! The moment John Brantley steps out onto the field... hes the best QB on either team! The only area of concern with Brantley in the game would come from short yardage situations, and running the option. Tebow can keep or pitch... Brantley is a pitch guy.
3. We can loose to LSU and still go to the National Championship. Loosing to LSU wouldn't be as bad as loosing to UGA. We still make the SEC Championship game, we beat Bama, and you think the voters are going to keep us out based on 1 loss, on the road at night against the #4 team in the country, when we didnt have our QB? Your dreaming. We'd be in that game.
http://sports.espn.go.com/espn/colum...6&sportCat=ncf
Tebow plays, I'm going to be pissed. No reason for it. |
For once I agree with you completely. I hope they are just keeping this charade going to make the game planning more difficult for LSU. But then again, is the offense really that different under Brantley? I'm guessing just less QB keepers and a bit more passing. And I know that his being sick, while likely not helping, didn't cause his concussion these are the same reasons he had no business being in the game against UK for so long. Probably shouldn't have even played at all.