Quote:
Originally Posted by 1bad65
They are butthurt because the Camaros outperform the SRTs, and are slightly cheaper than the R/Ts.
Seriously, I got banned over there for posting in thread they started saying that the Camaros were slower in the 1/4 mile than the advertised time (12.9), and the Challenger R/Ts were low 13 sec cars. I posted two vids of bone stock Camaros running better than 12.9s, and then told them to post vids of bone stock R/Ts running low 13s. They not only banned me, they deleted every one of my posts.
|
there are a lot of guys over there that refuse to like anything but the challenger, which is one of the reasons i started coming over here. much more open to a civil discussion between brands and laid back. you guys are much more open to a multi-sided debate, where as a lot (not all) of those guys are very one sided.
i cant vouch for any new camaro times at the track, but i can vouch that there indeed have been a couple stock R/T's hitting low to mid 13's. i know i cant get times like that. i've said in another post that it all comes down to the driver. most challenger drivers will not be able to get those times, but it is possible. a known member "dodgetony" over on the challenger board ran a 13.12 i believe with just a filter pull and lowered tire pressure in his auto R/T with only a couple hundred miles on it when he first got it. he posted time slips too.
i'm sure not all camaro drivers will be able to get below 13 sec, but we all know its possible and the car is clearly capable of it WITH THE RIGHT DRIVER.
i know it means nothing if i dont have time slips or video to post, which i do not at this time, so i guess believe it or dont believe it.
1bad65, i think i remember you getting banned and thinking "wow, i wonder what other boards are thinking of this one?" now i know...its a shame that you guys think of us challenger guys like that.:(