Autoweek ZL1 Auto vs Manual Results
Not trying to upset my auto friends but found this as an interesting read.
http://www.autoweek.com/article/2012...n=awdailydrive |
Not a bad review, but he definitely missed the lever to flip the seats forward. :)
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
But the lever only tips the seat back forward . . it does not make the seat move forward to make getting in the back seat even easier.
|
Nice read, I hadn't seen that article before! I agree about the trunk opening, but it wasn't going to deter me from buying the car. I do wish there was an easy seat release (and yes, know where my tilt lever is).
OP, thanks for posting. |
Pretty good read!
I don't think i'd end up getting an Automatic Camaro in general, takes away 90% of the fun :D |
Quote:
Good read. |
In a recent magazine the M5 out ran the ZL1 in testing. Why? Manual (ZL1) vs. Auto (M5).
580hp, 4120 lb Camaro ZL1 560 hp, 4300 lb M5 The M5 had less hp and more weight, yet it out ran the ZL1 and trapped several MPH faster down the 1/4 mile. Why? The M5s (7 speed auto clutch) shifted faster along with better gearing (more gears). Yes, manuals may be more fun (for some). But the facts are when a cars are equipped with modern sophisticated automatics, they're faster. |
Quote:
If I want to use the manual function I have the option to use the paddle shifters. |
Quote:
|
Standard trans is over rated, I dig the hell out of the auto in ZL1 ...
|
Why does the auto have to pay a second gas guzzler tax?
Isn't the fuel economy the same for both trans.? |
Quote:
No, manual is better by something like one level ... |
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:19 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9 Beta 4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.