Chevrolet Corvette Stingray C7 Forum

Chevrolet Corvette Stingray C7 Forum (https://www.corvette7.com/forums/index.php)
-   LT1 (6.2L V8) Powertrain and Drivetrain Discussions (https://www.corvette7.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=160)
-   -   Guesses at actual certified Corvette Stingray HP/TQ numbers? (https://www.corvette7.com/forums/showthread.php?t=280143)

imported_Joker 01-17-2013 04:01 PM

490 / 470 I'm going with.

imported_GretchenGotGrowl 01-17-2013 05:28 PM

490-515 HP/475-500 TQ.

GaBoy25 01-17-2013 05:32 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Stingray (Post 1059)
465hp / 460tq

I think you nailed that one on the head.

When I read it it just works.:D


Not that I wouldn't want more; I just rather not be let down. :o

Deki 01-17-2013 05:49 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by menendez1293 (Post 902)



Your taking RWHP right? Because a C6 Z06 has 505 at the crank

No I'm talking crank hp/tq. 480/480 sounds good to me, it would still allow the C6 Z06 to be the better performer between the two with lighter weight, more power, and larger contact patch, and it would give the newest generation Z(whatever) vettes lots of room to grow in the power department.

My honest guess, for the big dog vettes when they do come out, is going to be 600+hp, plus much bigger tires than what they offer on the base car (255/285).

2cnd chance 01-17-2013 07:09 PM

475/475

shank0668 01-17-2013 07:54 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Corvettexotic (Post 1213)
475/475

That was my thought.

GaBoy25 01-17-2013 08:10 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by GretchenGotGrowl (Post 1178)
490-515 HP/475-500 TQ.


Sweet Jesus.:eek:

imported_GretchenGotGrowl 01-17-2013 08:49 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by GaBoy25 (Post 1249)
Sweet Jesus.:eek:

Fella can dream can't he?

GaBoy25 01-17-2013 08:50 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by GretchenGotGrowl (Post 1279)
Fella can dream can't he?


Oh he is;)

imported_GretchenGotGrowl 01-17-2013 09:03 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by GaBoy25 (Post 1280)
Oh he is;)

There is some logic to my madness. First, you don't add DI, higher CR and VVT to an engine and only see 20 HP. On top of that the C5 Z06 was 405 HP and the C6 LT was 430 HP. So, doesn't seem like GM has a problem with the base model making more than the prior generation performance/track model. Would be nice, wouldn't it?

GaBoy25 01-17-2013 09:05 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by GretchenGotGrowl (Post 1297)
There is some logic to my madness. First, you don't add DI, higher CR and VVT to an engine and only see 20 HP. On top of that the C5 Z06 was 405 HP and the C6 LT was 430 HP. So, doesn't seem like GM has a problem with the base model making more than the prior generation performance/track model. Would be nice, wouldn't it?

I like your logic. I do get your drift and certainly hope your right

OctaneZ28 01-17-2013 09:10 PM

It's tough to guess.
DI, high CR, and VVT are good for power. However AFM is bad for power.

But I have a hunch that we will be pleasantly surprised. :)

imported_GretchenGotGrowl 01-17-2013 09:15 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by GaBoy25 (Post 1300)
I like your logic. I do get your drift and certainly hope your right

Quote:

Originally Posted by Octane (Post 1305)
It's tough to guess.
DI, high CR, and VVT are good for power. However AFM is bad for power.

But I have a hunch that we will be pleasantly surprised. :)

Me too!:D

Camaro_Corvette 01-21-2013 12:38 PM

475/470

Two years later.

485/480


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:32 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9 Beta 4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.