The 2014 Corvette Stingray Forum
News / Blog Register Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Go Back   Chevrolet Corvette Stingray C7 Forum > Members Area > General Automotive + Other Cars Discussion

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 06-26-2023, 09:19 AM   #1
bennettag10
me like fast cars
 
bennettag10's Avatar
 
Drives: 2500 Silverado, 2010 Camaro
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: College Station, TX
Posts: 40
2024 Chevy Silverado EV reviews are up!

https://www.silveradoevolution.com/f...lly-here.6563/

Positive reviews and the press seems impressed. The WT trim would be my choice with that awesome 450 mi range.
__________________


2SS. R/S. CGM. 6 Speed Manual. Grey Interior. Polished 20s.
bennettag10 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-26-2023, 05:45 PM   #2
KMPrenger


 
KMPrenger's Avatar
 
Drives: 16 Camaro SS, 15 Colorado
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Jefferson City, Missouri
Posts: 13,943
Oops. Price went up by 10 grand.

https://www.caranddriver.com/news/a4...ck-price-hike/
__________________
2016 Camaro 1SS - 8-speed - NPP - Black bowties
2010 Camaro 1LT V6 (Sold. I will miss her!)
KMPrenger is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-26-2023, 08:33 PM   #3
PYROLYSIS
Remember the Charleston 9
 
PYROLYSIS's Avatar
 
Drives: 2004 KME PREDATOR, 2014 2SS/RS/1LE
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Summerv1LE SC
Posts: 5,381
I saw another test where that WT was $77k.
__________________
BRING BACK THE B4C POLICE CAMARO!
2002 V-6 5 speed rally red (current camaro) Also driven:1992 Z-28 305 auto Red w/ black stripes (anniversary), 2001 V-6 auto light pewter metallic,1991 RS V-6 auto Black
PYROLYSIS is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-26-2023, 09:48 PM   #4
Blue 13
3P171 USAF Combat Arms
 
Blue 13's Avatar
 
Drives: 2013 SS/RS
Join Date: Jul 2021
Location: Olmsted AFB
Posts: 264
Yay!!! Pay more for less capability and utility!
__________________
416ci LS3/Vortech V7/Built 6L80
991.8 RWHP 792.4 RWTQ
Blue 13 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-27-2023, 07:57 AM   #5
GearheadSS


 
GearheadSS's Avatar
 
Drives: 23 LT1/22 Colorado TB/69 Chevelle
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Greenville, Tx
Posts: 4,970
Too expensive. I don't see our store having many buyers for the $100k versions. I certainly won't be ordering them for stock.
GearheadSS is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-27-2023, 07:57 AM   #6
Realist

 
Realist's Avatar
 
Drives: No Camaro :(
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: Chitown Burbs
Posts: 1,136
Always a fan of the Avalanches functionality. Like the style of the RST but it needs a functioning sunroof and is priced too high to me to give serious consideration. Seems like they are another year away from actually being on dealer lots.

Saw a GM commercial that said “EV’s for everyone, everywhere”, all I see are Teslas and a few KIA’s in Naperville and Lemont IL.
Realist is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-27-2023, 10:37 AM   #7
shaffe


 
Drives: 21 Bronco
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Carol Stream
Posts: 6,024
I still like how Ford basically took an F-150 and just made it electric, the styling on the Silverado EV leaves a lot to be desired but it sure seems to be more efficient offers more practicality

So someone explain like I am 5, how is the Chevy able to get so much more range than the F-150 lightning? Is it because the lightning is closer to a traditional F-150 and the silverado is on this fully dedicated EV platform?
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by 72MachOne99GT View Post
Lets keep it simple. ..
it has more power...its available power is like a set kof double Ds (no matter where your face is... theyre everywhere) it has the suspension to mame it matter...(
shaffe is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-27-2023, 11:30 AM   #8
snizzle
Recalled user
 
snizzle's Avatar
 
Drives: '12 Camaro SS, '18 Colorado Z71
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Richmond, VA
Posts: 3,419
Quote:
Originally Posted by shaffe View Post
I still like how Ford basically took an F-150 and just made it electric, the styling on the Silverado EV leaves a lot to be desired but it sure seems to be more efficient offers more practicality

So someone explain like I am 5, how is the Chevy able to get so much more range than the F-150 lightning? Is it because the lightning is closer to a traditional F-150 and the silverado is on this fully dedicated EV platform?
GM decided on a dedicated platform rather than a hack-a-chassis attempt to get to market first. Aerodynamic efficiencies and packaging gains on a clean slate design.
__________________

2012 2SS 45th AE LS3 M6

Borla ATAK Catback
Kooks Stepped LT Headers
CAI Intake
Hexvents
VMAX CNC Ported Throttle Body
RX Catch Can
Hurst Short Throw Shifter
Pfadt ZL-Spec Stage 3 Suspension
Forgestar F14
Tuned by Frost
snizzle is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-27-2023, 01:59 PM   #9
FRANK121
 
FRANK121's Avatar
 
Drives: 2022 Camaro ZL1
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Sullivan, Missouri
Posts: 653
Currently, the only vehicle being produced is the 4WT work trim, at a whopping $79,800 (delivered), but that does offer a big 450-mile range. The non-fleet RST First Edition has a 400-mile range and will cost $106,895.

Ahhh NO THANKS!
__________________
2022 Black ZL1
RotoFab CAI, AWE Touring Edition Cat Back Exhaust.
665 Crank hp. est. and 660 Crank ft. lbs. est.
Never been Dynoed
FRANK121 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-29-2023, 01:31 AM   #10
RLHMARINES
1st Civ. Div.
 
RLHMARINES's Avatar
 
Drives: Camaroless for now...RIP "Big SexZ"
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Savannah, Ga
Posts: 2,726
Quote:
Originally Posted by shaffe View Post
I still like how Ford basically took an F-150 and just made it electric, the styling on the Silverado EV leaves a lot to be desired but it sure seems to be more efficient offers more practicality

So someone explain like I am 5, how is the Chevy able to get so much more range than the F-150 lightning? Is it because the lightning is closer to a traditional F-150 and the silverado is on this fully dedicated EV platform?
Yes! The Silverado EV has a much more efficiently design platform from the ground up and a much bigger battery. The top models, RST & 4WT come installed with the biggest battery pack. The future 1, 2, and 3WT models will have smaller less costly batteries but also lower descending range in each.

I really like this truck and I'm a fan of the old Avalanche but I can't quite come up with the coin for this first edition RST version.
__________________
Swift....Silent....Deadly
RLHMARINES is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-29-2023, 10:12 AM   #11
el ess A
Older Than Dirt
 
el ess A's Avatar
 
Drives: 2010 & 2013 Camaros
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Aiken, SC
Posts: 4,564
Hmmmm.

It MSRPs almost 80K. That's around $20K more than my 6.2 2020 Denali cost me with my discounts. Right now it says on the highway (why else would you want to go 450 miles?) I get around 24- ish MPG. To which I'm really happy with.

Thus, estimate even 5 bucks per gallon in fuel cost. Could be more, could be less, but for this estimation it'll be 5 bucks.

$20K /5 bucks/gal. = 4,000 gallons of fuel. At 24-ish mpg, that's still racking up 96,000 miles of travel. It's paid off and I've owned it a little over 3 years now and just turned 6K miles on it recently on a 1500 mile round trip. At this rate, I'll have a mere 26K miles on it in 2033.

And that's BEFORE you plug that EV in for the first time and pay for that electricity.

No thanks. I'll save money by keeping what I got. Gas would have to be over $20/gallon for me to have it make financial sense.
__________________
2010 2SS TE, 1 of 822/2013 Camaro ZL1 vert, 1 of 54

http://www.camaro5.com/forums/image.php?type=sigpic&userid=26108&dateline=142898  4774
el ess A is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-29-2023, 01:28 PM   #12
bigd1276
2017 HyperBlue 2SS
 
bigd1276's Avatar
 
Drives: 2017 HyperBlue Camaro 2SS
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: PA
Posts: 2,137
Quote:
Originally Posted by el ess A View Post
Hmmmm.

It MSRPs almost 80K. That's around $20K more than my 6.2 2020 Denali cost me with my discounts. Right now it says on the highway (why else would you want to go 450 miles?) I get around 24- ish MPG. To which I'm really happy with.

Thus, estimate even 5 bucks per gallon in fuel cost. Could be more, could be less, but for this estimation it'll be 5 bucks.

$20K /5 bucks/gal. = 4,000 gallons of fuel. At 24-ish mpg, that's still racking up 96,000 miles of travel. It's paid off and I've owned it a little over 3 years now and just turned 6K miles on it recently on a 1500 mile round trip. At this rate, I'll have a mere 26K miles on it in 2033.

And that's BEFORE you plug that EV in for the first time and pay for that electricity.

No thanks. I'll save money by keeping what I got. Gas would have to be over $20/gallon for me to have it make financial sense.
You're not supposed to figure that out.
__________________
]
http://www.camaro5.com/forums/showthread.php?t=30755

2010 IBM 2LT RS......Traded for.....
2012 IBM 2SS RS......Traded for.....
2017 HBM 2SS
bigd1276 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-01-2023, 01:18 AM   #13
genxer
 
Drives: multiple cars
Join Date: Oct 2017
Location: Pennsylvania
Posts: 475
Quote:
I still like how Ford basically took an F-150 and just made it electric, the styling on the Silverado EV leaves a lot to be desired but it sure seems to be more efficient offers more practicality
Quote:
Yes! The Silverado EV has a much more efficiently design platform from the ground up and a much bigger battery. The top models, RST & 4WT come installed with the biggest battery pack. The future 1, 2, and 3WT models will have smaller less costly batteries but also lower descending range in each.

I really like this truck and I'm a fan of the old Avalanche but I can't quite come up with the coin for this first edition RST version.
They have a stiff unibody like structure... tip-toeing toward the EV Escalade.
Why wouldn't they: Just skip the Hummer; Work the bugs out with a couple focused trims of this EV Avalanche; Then already by now have an EV Escalade with the watts to freedom 0-60?

gm's decisions appears fearful.
They're more worried about pacing the Cyber Truck than grabbing their next reliable billion or so.

Trucks do a lot of things well, in different configurations. And there's a point where allowing the frame to flex is helpful. The battery cells aren't there for more than narrow case users, or even to let them spec the other things cheap enough.
genxer is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:33 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9 Beta 4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.