07-27-2007, 01:29 AM | #85 |
www.Camaro5store.com
|
GMPP to Sell LS3 by Nov 07
GMHTP give us a little snippit of info on page 10 saying:
In mid-November, two LS3 crate engines-the LS376/485 (EFI) and LS376/500 (carbed)-will be available. These are LS3's with cam upgrades; both will run around $7,000. ...with that being said, this UPGRADED LS3 engine is going for less than half of an LS7. Now, add that up in the price of the Camaro and I don't think we are going to go through the roof here. I think that is good news that an upgraded LS3 is 7k. |
07-27-2007, 01:33 AM | #86 |
I used to be Dragoneye...
|
That's really, REALLY,REALLYgood to know nice find...
LS3 it is! |
08-05-2007, 10:51 PM | #87 |
I used to be Dragoneye...
|
Hey, I know some of you were wondering about the Active Fuel Management system in the LS3. Well, I found a picture that better demonstrates what I was going on about...
That is the "thing" that "disconnects" the Pushrods from the Camshaft...just thought you'd all like to know |
08-06-2007, 02:45 AM | #88 |
www.Camaro5store.com
|
^Nice find!
|
08-14-2007, 03:17 PM | #89 |
Camaro Fanatic
|
so if the base corvette LS2 got 28 miles to the gallon, and LS7 got 25 both without DOD, what will this LS3 get with DOD?
|
08-14-2007, 04:38 PM | #90 |
Moderator.ca
|
depends (as always) on how hard you stomp on the gas. I think I have heard 30-ish as the target for a v-8 camaro. makes sense, somewhat heavier car but a more efficient system. The two should at least ballance off and give numbers like the LS2 corvette. When driven conservatively
|
08-14-2007, 04:48 PM | #91 | |
Drives: 2012 Camaro SS Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Chicago/Carbondale
Posts: 815
|
Quote:
Ofcourse we are talking about highway mpg right? So that would mean low 20s on city mpg. Ive mentioned my dads 06 Impala SS with cylinder deactiviation alot but on the highway he gets with trunk and full car 30 mpg and with just a driver in the car he gets 21 mpg. Just my lil 2 cents about V8 fuel mileage
__________________
-Tim
|
|
08-14-2007, 11:17 PM | #92 |
www.Camaro5store.com
|
GM hopes to get 30+ as they have said in many interviews. It could be a possibility w/ all the DOD, ACD, AFM, and whatever else they want to call it or switch the names to. Basically, there are a few different things they could do to the engine, if I am correct. Add these into the equation and 30+ (I would only have to assume HWY) wouldn't be so far fetched. 30 is still better than the 24 I'm getting in my SS now. That works for me!
|
08-15-2007, 12:30 AM | #93 |
I used to be Dragoneye...
|
I like to put it into perspective for some of my friends here...of course I assume (when I'm with them) that Camaro is getting the LS3:
430hp... okay?... now... 30+ mpg hwy... Let that sink in And now we're talking Camaro! |
08-15-2007, 03:11 AM | #94 |
I just like V8s
Drives: 2007 Corvette Z06 Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Stuttgart, Germany
Posts: 919
|
Did I miss something? Will future variations of the LS3 have DOD?
All the current reviews for the new LS3 Vette are showing 16/26 mpg.
__________________
"Anyone know who sells the driver mods?"
2007 Corvette Z06: Le Mans blue, 2LZ |
08-15-2007, 03:29 AM | #95 |
E.B.A.H.
Drives: you wild... Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: In the happy padded room wearing a jacket that makes me hug myself...
Posts: 18,421
|
The camaro is rumored to have DoD. I don't know about the current vette running the LS3 though.
|
08-15-2007, 08:17 PM | #96 |
Drives: 1968 Camaro Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Naples,Florida
Posts: 184
|
IMO: Horse Power rating have always been advertised lower that actual, and MPG have always been advertised higher than actual. Just my 2.5 cents, but I have never had a car hit the MPG range that was posted on the window. Example: My 2004 Tahoe average today is 14.6 MPG. ouch:eek:
|
08-15-2007, 08:27 PM | #97 | |
I used to be Dragoneye...
|
Quote:
The mentioned 16/26 mpg rating is true as far as I can tell. But keep in mind, this is under the new EPA testing procedures, so it estimates more acurately the Fuel economy. 16/26 is probably the "equivalant" of 17-18/28-30 mpg under the old ratings...still pretty good especially for no DoD. Here's one of the better articles I've found so far: http://blogs.automotive.com/6209025/...ent/index.html Quote:
Last edited by Mr. Wyndham; 08-15-2007 at 09:02 PM. |
|
08-15-2007, 09:58 PM | #98 |
Drives: '99 Wrangler Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: North Carolina
Posts: 201
|
The L76 is a great engine, but whether or not they come from the factory with them, I'm putting an LS3 between the fenders of mine
|
|
|
|
|