Camaro5 Chevy Camaro Forum / Camaro ZL1, SS and V6 Forums - Camaro5.com
 
Phastek Performance
Go Back   Camaro5 Chevy Camaro Forum / Camaro ZL1, SS and V6 Forums - Camaro5.com > General Camaro Forums > Camaro Photos | Spyshots | Video | Media Gallery


Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 10-30-2006, 09:30 PM   #1
KILLER74Z28
MOD SQUAD
 
KILLER74Z28's Avatar
 
Drives: 2G1FT1EW9A9100666
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: West Michigan
Posts: 5,782
www.gmcanada.com

http://www.gmcanada.com/english/vehi...maro/index.jsp

Take a look at the Camaro on www.gmcanada.com looks a lot different from the Camaro concept and I mean a lot different. Possible computer generated photos

The intro is KICK ASS
KILLER74Z28 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-31-2006, 01:45 AM   #2
TAG UR IT
www.Camaro5store.com
 
TAG UR IT's Avatar
 
Drives: 2014 ZL1 #705
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: SA, Texas
Posts: 26,558
Went to both links. Checked out all the different areas. Looked at all the Camaro photos. I can't seem to figure out what you are talking about. I tried. They are all the same original GM released photos. Give me a specific about how it's different or something.
TAG UR IT is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-31-2006, 05:33 AM   #3
$anani
 
$anani's Avatar
 
Drives: chevy s10
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: las vegas
Posts: 78
i see no diffrent either?
$anani is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-31-2006, 08:04 AM   #4
Urthman
Future Camaro Owner
 
Urthman's Avatar
 
Drives: 2010 Jeep Wrangler Sahara 4dr
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Virginia
Posts: 544
I don't see a difference. The only thing that is even slightly possible to be different is the wheels are more chrome than painted on the image in the menu, but that can easily be one in photoshop. The gallery pics are all the same old shots. Those wallpapers are pretty sweet though.
Urthman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-31-2006, 08:23 AM   #5
LowRider
LowRider
 
LowRider's Avatar
 
Drives: 1992 Camaro Z28 & 1996 S-10
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: WV
Posts: 390
Send a message via AIM to LowRider Send a message via Yahoo to LowRider
I don't see any difference either. They all look the same to me.
LowRider is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-31-2006, 08:28 AM   #6
Moose
Moderator
 
Moose's Avatar
 
Drives: '99 Camaro SS #1392
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Newtown, Pa.
Posts: 3,982
Very cool. Thanks for the link. Only difference I noticed where what appeared to be smaller diameter wheels/tires?
Moose is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-31-2006, 10:35 AM   #7
LowRider
LowRider
 
LowRider's Avatar
 
Drives: 1992 Camaro Z28 & 1996 S-10
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: WV
Posts: 390
Send a message via AIM to LowRider Send a message via Yahoo to LowRider
You know the intro is very cool.
LowRider is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-31-2006, 01:16 PM   #8
BlacLac02
Banned
 
Drives: 2002 Cadillac Escalade & STS
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Canton,Oh
Posts: 263
Send a message via AIM to BlacLac02
dude its the same as the concept. they dont make a different concept for canada than they do for here. the only slight difference was that the heaadlights appeared to be on. but in no way was it "totally different"
BlacLac02 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-31-2006, 01:33 PM   #9
KILLER74Z28
MOD SQUAD
 
KILLER74Z28's Avatar
 
Drives: 2G1FT1EW9A9100666
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: West Michigan
Posts: 5,782
Name:  capture.jpg
Views: 2100
Size:  26.5 KB

Name:  capture3.jpg
Views: 2205
Size:  20.0 KB

Don’t look at the photo gallery those are the same pictures we have been looking at for months. When the link first comes up and there is a side view of the Camaro take a closer look at the front and rear fascia’s. Also, check the roof line. Here I robbed these from a website, this might help.

Last edited by KILLER74Z28; 10-31-2006 at 01:58 PM.
KILLER74Z28 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-31-2006, 03:11 PM   #10
Urthman
Future Camaro Owner
 
Urthman's Avatar
 
Drives: 2010 Jeep Wrangler Sahara 4dr
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Virginia
Posts: 544
Quote:
Originally Posted by KILLER74Z28 View Post
Attachment 335

Attachment 336

Don’t look at the photo gallery those are the same pictures we have been looking at for months. When the link first comes up and there is a side view of the Camaro take a closer look at the front and rear fascia’s. Also, check the roof line. Here I robbed these from a website, this might help.

Looking at them next to each other I see what you're saying. There are slight differences in these two pics.
Urthman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-31-2006, 08:33 PM   #11
KILLER74Z28
MOD SQUAD
 
KILLER74Z28's Avatar
 
Drives: 2G1FT1EW9A9100666
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: West Michigan
Posts: 5,782
Name:  cut1.jpg
Views: 1887
Size:  20.8 KB

Name:  cut2.jpg
Views: 1931
Size:  30.2 KB

Name:  cut3.jpg
Views: 1832
Size:  30.6 KB

Name:  cut4.jpg
Views: 5460
Size:  27.3 KB

This is what I can see:

Front fascia: more of an over hang, line in front fender separating fender from front fascia, not as rounded as the Concept’s front fascia.

Rear fascia: taller, more space where Chevy emblem is mounted, the lights are taller and more square, and from a side view the rear is flatter not as rounded as the Concept’s. Might be how they made the car taller for more head room and kept the look?

The roof line: taller and there looks to be a B pillar, although I don’t see the production Camaro having a B pillar. Could just be a chrome/painted strip to show more detail.

The side mirrors look to be bigger and more functional.

The Camaro looks to be thinner not as wide.

Now I know these pictures are most likely CGI but this is an official GM website and not some everyday Joe’s hack job. What if we a re looking at hints to what the production Camaro is going to look like? Just a thought…
KILLER74Z28 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-31-2006, 08:54 PM   #12
camaro2009
camaro2009
 
camaro2009's Avatar
 
Drives: 2013 ZL-1 AGM 6M #0369
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Missouri,Hume
Posts: 101
Send a message via Yahoo to camaro2009
I can definately tell a difference on the front fascia, but the mirrors appear to be the same, and im still not seeing the roofline change. The rear definately seems to me to be NOT as rounded, perhaps squared off a bit, almost like the vette?
__________________
2013 Camaro ZL-1 AGM M6
2010 Camaro 2SS CGM with SIM stripes(Traded)
2007 Chevy Duramax Dually LBCC
1974 Camaro Type LT
1995 Camaro Plum V-6 Auto 80k original miles

Traded the '10 SS for the BAD ASS 2013 ZL-1 AGM ,M-6 Once again the thanks go out to my wonderful wife and a chance encounter while servicing my Duramax!! Destiny......nope...FATE
camaro2009 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-31-2006, 11:37 PM   #13
TAG UR IT
www.Camaro5store.com
 
TAG UR IT's Avatar
 
Drives: 2014 ZL1 #705
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: SA, Texas
Posts: 26,558
Ok...so I can see exactly what you were talking about now that they are side by side. I see the front and rear. Don't necessarily see the mirrors, though. I see the tail lights and wheels being smaller. I can completely agree w/ you that someone could be trying to hint at things to come. Now that takes a trained eye. Very nice observations there, Killer.
TAG UR IT is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-01-2006, 06:35 AM   #14
BlacLac02
Banned
 
Drives: 2002 Cadillac Escalade & STS
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Canton,Oh
Posts: 263
Send a message via AIM to BlacLac02
whatever you say killer. over all the car still has the exact same appearance , ok so maybe the angle was changed when they took the photo but .....its still the same car
BlacLac02 is offline   Reply With Quote
 
Reply

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:09 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9 Beta 4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.