Camaro5 Chevy Camaro Forum / Camaro ZL1, SS and V6 Forums - Camaro5.com
 
Phastek Performance
Go Back   Camaro5 Chevy Camaro Forum / Camaro ZL1, SS and V6 Forums - Camaro5.com > General Camaro Forums > 5th Gen Camaro SS LS LT General Discussions


Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 04-28-2010, 01:23 PM   #71
brtaus
 
brtaus's Avatar
 
Drives: None
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Phoenix, AZ
Posts: 574
Quote:
Originally Posted by Unfair View Post
The SS comes with a 1000w sound system, and HID's?
also the GT comes standard with 19 inch rims per the site, what are you adding there that is bigger?
comfort package? seems like you are decking this baby out lol
SS/RS comes with a stereo system w/a sub standard, the mustang does not, so you have to upgrade stereo to get it. The comfort package is electric seat and seat warmers (all three standard on SS/RS), so they have to be added. As for rims, the package comes with the 19's, so its included in price. I didn't add anything extra. and yes, the SS/RS comes with HIDs standard.
brtaus is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-28-2010, 01:24 PM   #72
Sax1031


 
Drives: 2000 Mustang GT
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Elgin,SC
Posts: 2,707
Here is what I came up with.

2010, and let me stress 2010 pricing, Base 1SS with no options comes in at $31,795.

Now for the 2011 Mustang I built I added brembo brake package and 3.73 gear option and came up with $32,585. If you just go with the brembo brake package you are looking at $32,190.

Those prices are very comparable.
Sax1031 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-28-2010, 01:27 PM   #73
brtaus
 
brtaus's Avatar
 
Drives: None
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Phoenix, AZ
Posts: 574
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sax1031 View Post
Here is what I came up with.

2010, and let me stress 2010 pricing, Base 1SS with no options comes in at $31,795.

Now for the 2011 Mustang I built I added brembo brake package and 3.73 gear option and came up with $32,585. If you just go with the brembo brake package you are looking at $32,190.

Those prices are very comparable.
I was doing a 2SS/RS compared to a GT premium with the Trim package
brtaus is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-28-2010, 01:28 PM   #74
Enator
 
Drives: 2011 SHELBY GT500 & Volvo S80
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Sweden
Posts: 395
Why I like Mustang more and more



Enator is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-28-2010, 01:32 PM   #75
Sax1031


 
Drives: 2000 Mustang GT
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Elgin,SC
Posts: 2,707
Quote:
Originally Posted by brtaus View Post
I was doing a 2SS/RS compared to a GT premium with the Trim package
2SS with interior accent trim package is $35,295.

GT premium with interior trim package is $35,795.
Sax1031 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-28-2010, 01:36 PM   #76
ULTRAZLS1


 
ULTRAZLS1's Avatar
 
Drives: 14 Silverado LTZ Z71, 16 Camaro SS
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Jackson, Michigan
Posts: 4,407
Quote:
Originally Posted by Unfair View Post
Let's all ignore this review because they ran a 12.7 with the mustang, it runs 13.3 like edmunds said! let's stick to that review.
Lets all ignore the 13.3 because it ran a 12.7 in motor trend. It runs a 12.7 like motor trend said! lets stick to that review. And popular mechanics of 13.0, car and driver of 13.2, edmunds also at 13.0, motor trend also at 12.8 once.

The only credible run in the GT for the mustang fan is a 12.7. THe only credible runs in thr GT for the camaro fan is obviously going to be the slower ones. This is just the way of the world.
Is your sole purpose on this website only to argue about how good the mustang is? That is the only thing I ever see you doing.

Go get a mustang and register on stangnet or something if you love them so much. I just dont know why so many of you mustang guys waste your time here. It is worse on this website than any other GM based board I have been on.

Must be a lot of people are jealous/worried/angry in some way based on the camaro's performance/price/looks/sales success or any combination of the above. Their is also the immaturity factor as well.

Last edited by ULTRAZLS1; 04-28-2010 at 01:46 PM.
ULTRAZLS1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-28-2010, 01:46 PM   #77
hair10
 
hair10's Avatar
 
Drives: 2SS - Transformer Edition
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Peoria, IL
Posts: 455
I just built the closest Mustang equivalent to my car as possible. It came up to just over $39K, which is before taxes/title/license. I paid about $2K less out the door... and that included a $1K Transformer package which I can't do on the Mustang.

Seems a tad on the pricey side to me.
__________________
There are 542,000 children in foster care. Talk to your local foster and adoptive agency. You could change a life.

hair10 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-28-2010, 01:48 PM   #78
brtaus
 
brtaus's Avatar
 
Drives: None
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Phoenix, AZ
Posts: 574
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sax1031 View Post
2SS with interior accent trim package is $35,295.

GT premium with interior trim package is $35,795.
A fully loaded, all-you-can-eat 2SS/RS is 35,995.

A GT does not come standard with:
-heated seats
-electric driver seat
-gears close to 3.45 (they are standard with 3.21 gears)
-20" wheels (standard is 19")
-sub woofer (you have to upgrade stereo to get it)
-HID's
-brembo brakes


Those are all standard on a 2SS/RS.

So, I had to add them to the GT and that is where you get the higher price tag.
brtaus is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-28-2010, 01:56 PM   #79
Dep130
Póg mo thóin!
 
Drives: 2SS/RS IOM
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Akron, Ohio
Posts: 127
I think they are all great looking cars. I went with the camaro because I have always wanted one. Any of them are better than a ricemobile
Dep130 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-28-2010, 02:06 PM   #80
Unfair
Banned
 
Drives: 2001 Camaro SS
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 754
Quote:
Originally Posted by ULTRAZLS1 View Post
Lets all ignore the 13.3 because it ran a 12.7 in motor trend. It runs a 12.7 like motor trend said! lets stick to that review. And popular mechanics of 13.0, car and driver of 13.2, edmunds also at 13.0, motor trend also at 12.8 once.

The only credible run in the GT for the mustang fan is a 12.7. THe only credible runs in thr GT for the camaro fan is obviously going to be the slower ones. This is just the way of the world.
Is your sole purpose on this website only to argue about how good the mustang is? That is the only thing I ever see you doing.

Go get a mustang and register on stangnet or something if you love them so much. I just dont know why so many of you mustang guys waste your time here. It is worse on this website than any other GM based board I have been on.

Must be a lot of people are jealous/worried/angry in some way based on the camaro's performance/price/looks/sales success or any combination of the above. Their is also the immaturity factor as well.

Too long, but cool man.
Unfair is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-28-2010, 02:07 PM   #81
Sax1031


 
Drives: 2000 Mustang GT
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Elgin,SC
Posts: 2,707
Quote:
Originally Posted by brtaus View Post
A fully loaded, all-you-can-eat 2SS/RS is 35,995.

A GT does not come standard with:
-heated seats
-electric driver seat
-gears close to 3.45 (they are standard with 3.21 gears)
-20" wheels (standard is 19")
-sub woofer (you have to upgrade stereo to get it)
-HID's
-brembo brakes


Those are all standard on a 2SS/RS.

So, I had to add them to the GT and that is where you get the higher price tag.
Here is what I got.

2010 2SS/RS with Interior trim accent package and audio system upgrade w/sub is $36,495 + $1,500 for the dealer having to install some stuff so it comes out to roughly $37,995.

For a 2011 Mustang GT premium w/ brembo brake package, security package, HIDs, interior comfort package(that includes heated seats and even power seats for the passenger), and Shaker 1000watt audio system the total comes to $38,595.

Still very comparable.
Sax1031 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-28-2010, 02:33 PM   #82
NoDak Scotty
 
Drives: Suburban/Z-71 CrewCab/1972 442 vert
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Minot, North Dakota
Posts: 34
The Camaro is .4 seconds and 1 mph slower...prolly due to an extra 350 pounds which is in the IRS, the dry sump oil tank, and heavier wheels. 9 qts of oil weighs a lot!
Also, as I understand it, the 5-Oh is already heavily modded with headers, etc, from the factory. Ford has squeezed a ton of power out of the smaller mill. On the other hand, the LS3 awaits your mods...
And maybe the fat guy drove the Camaro and the skinny guy the Mustang.
Either way, I'm good with less than half a second and 1 mph diff. And if Chevy fights back...even better.
NoDak Scotty is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-28-2010, 02:35 PM   #83
brtaus
 
brtaus's Avatar
 
Drives: None
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Phoenix, AZ
Posts: 574
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sax1031 View Post
Here is what I got.

2010 2SS/RS with Interior trim accent package and audio system upgrade w/sub is $36,495 + $1,500 for the dealer having to install some stuff so it comes out to roughly $37,995.

For a 2011 Mustang GT premium w/ brembo brake package, security package, HIDs, interior comfort package(that includes heated seats and even power seats for the passenger), and Shaker 1000watt audio system the total comes to $38,595.

Still very comparable.
No, I didn't do any dealer add-ons. The standard stereo for the 2SS/RS comes with amp and sub. What you are talking about is the MTX sub package added on by the dealer.
brtaus is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-28-2010, 02:38 PM   #84
radz28
Petro-sexual
 
radz28's Avatar
 
Drives: Ultra-Grin
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Crazy Coast
Posts: 15,201
Quote:
Originally Posted by NoDak Scotty View Post
The Camaro is .4 seconds and 1 mph slower...prolly due to an extra 350 pounds which is in the IRS, the dry sump oil tank, and heavier wheels. 9 qts of oil weighs a lot!
Also, as I understand it, the 5-Oh is already heavily modded with headers, etc, from the factory. Ford has squeezed a ton of power out of the smaller mill. On the other hand, the LS3 awaits your mods...
And maybe the fat guy drove the Camaro and the skinny guy the Mustang.
Either way, I'm good with less than half a second and 1 mph diff. And if Chevy fights back...even better.
Wet sump if I'm not mistaken.
radz28 is offline   Reply With Quote
 
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Gran Turismo 5... No Camaro? 5thGenOwner 5th Gen Camaro SS LS LT General Discussions 111 12-06-2011 10:06 AM
Im sure this has been asked before.. But forgive my innocence :) gmag21 Suspension / Brakes / Chassis 23 02-21-2010 10:29 PM
Official Camaro Convertible CONCEPT Press Release Tran Camaro Convertible Forum 12 11-18-2009 07:05 PM
What my personal research has turned up... Allentown Chevy Camaro vs... 27 11-05-2009 08:34 PM
July 2009 C&D: Mustang 209 pts, Camaro SS 193, Challenger SRT8 190 mkaresh Chevy Camaro vs... 143 05-26-2009 12:33 AM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:03 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9 Beta 4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.