The 2014 Corvette Stingray Forum
News / Blog Register Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Go Back   Chevrolet Corvette Stingray C7 Forum > Members Area > General Automotive + Other Cars Discussion

View Poll Results: .
Camaro 0 0%
Mustang 0 0%
Voters: 0. You may not vote on this poll

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 04-17-2010, 06:59 PM   #3445
thebrander
931HP w/100K mi warranty!
 
thebrander's Avatar
 
Drives: C6Z06 & Gen 5 2SS
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Houston, Texas
Posts: 137
Quote:
Originally Posted by THE EVIL TW1N View Post
theres already been people making that kinda power (and more ie 1400rwhp)with the stock 5.4 longblock with turbochargers. That doesnt even require lifting the valve covers!! Thats stock cams,block,crank,rods,stock pistons, everything but the intake manifold and exhaust. Hardly anything on the LS3 you showed is stock. Anyways i prefer to talk about something more realistic than these big dollar engines and stick to something a lil more simple like supercharger upgrades and things like that.
Yep, we're getting way off topic. Why not just put a rocket behind the Camaro, right?

So now I'm wondering which car (5.0 or SS) will be less expensive to get to say 650 BHP. That seems to be a reliable, drivable, and "competitive" number (compared to much more expensive cars that are still stock that someone would brag about beating if they got the chance to race).

EDIT: ... or maybe to stay within the realm of reliability we also consider HP upgrade packages for both cars that come with some sort of warranty.

Last edited by thebrander; 04-17-2010 at 07:13 PM. Reason: new idea
thebrander is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-17-2010, 07:02 PM   #3446
THE EVIL TW1N
Banned
 
Drives: 2003 Cobra Convertible
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: CA
Posts: 2,925
Quote:
Originally Posted by thebrander View Post
Exactly. My point is both engines are limited only by money. My guess is that the cost for a 200HP bump to the 5.0 will be the same for the LS3 (about $7000 for an SC and tune).

Although, I'm still doing my homework, I expect to find that FI on Ford engines is no different than GM engines. You just see a lot more cammed GM engines because the higher displacement yields more "untapped NA HP".

If the OHC is better for FI, are there any theories why?
i really dont know EXACTLY why, im told the DOHC heads flow better BUT just looking at flow numbers that isnt exactly the case. I think theres more at work than just flow numbers.....its magic......jk but theres probably other characteristics (other than just hard numbers) that make the DOHC better for boost i think.
To say their no different is kinda wrong though, the power levels might be similar but the DOHC's do it with less displacement. Theyre already working on a supercharger for the 5.0 that should put down 520ish RWHP @ only 7psi. I believe a supercharger upgrade for the 6.2 netted someone on here RWHP in the high 400's
THE EVIL TW1N is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-17-2010, 07:04 PM   #3447
Sax1031


 
Drives: 2000 Mustang GT
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Elgin,SC
Posts: 2,707
The only possible advantage the OHC motor would have is because they usually can turn higher rpm than pushrod motors.
Sax1031 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-17-2010, 07:04 PM   #3448
HIGHOCTANE
 
HIGHOCTANE's Avatar
 
Drives: 2010 IBM 2SS/RS
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: NC
Posts: 448
I kind of liked my wittle 4.6 DOHC Ford motor..1st run is 10.5#, second run 15.5....anything higher and the shock would shut down my HDD video camera...sorry...21 psi...is plain RETAREDED lol


__________________

2010 IBM 2SS/RS Camaro (M6)
Previous rides:
2003 Twin Turbo Mustang Cobra(900 RWHP)
2004 KB S/C Mustang Cobra(700 RWHP)
2003 Mustang GT,Heads,Cam, N20 ect..

Last edited by HIGHOCTANE; 04-17-2010 at 07:22 PM.
HIGHOCTANE is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-17-2010, 07:12 PM   #3449
HIGHOCTANE
 
HIGHOCTANE's Avatar
 
Drives: 2010 IBM 2SS/RS
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: NC
Posts: 448
Here is another...measely 4.6..actually 284 CI....16.5 psi IIRC(~700 RWHP),...camera managed to record this runsince it was being held...again starting slow in 2nd gear..1st is useless on the street.
I'd LOVE to set my Camaro up the same way..maybe one day.......
__________________

2010 IBM 2SS/RS Camaro (M6)
Previous rides:
2003 Twin Turbo Mustang Cobra(900 RWHP)
2004 KB S/C Mustang Cobra(700 RWHP)
2003 Mustang GT,Heads,Cam, N20 ect..

Last edited by HIGHOCTANE; 04-17-2010 at 07:23 PM.
HIGHOCTANE is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-17-2010, 07:18 PM   #3450
thebrander
931HP w/100K mi warranty!
 
thebrander's Avatar
 
Drives: C6Z06 & Gen 5 2SS
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Houston, Texas
Posts: 137
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sax1031 View Post
The only possible advantage the OHC motor would have is because they usually can turn higher rpm than pushrod motors.
So that makes sense: you can turn the same size pulley faster and create more boost.
thebrander is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-17-2010, 07:30 PM   #3451
THE EVIL TW1N
Banned
 
Drives: 2003 Cobra Convertible
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: CA
Posts: 2,925
Quote:
Originally Posted by thebrander View Post
So that makes sense: you can turn the same size pulley faster and create more boost.
most roots/twin screw supeys dont rely on rpms at all and actually lose some boost at higher rpms.
THE EVIL TW1N is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-17-2010, 07:31 PM   #3452
thebrander
931HP w/100K mi warranty!
 
thebrander's Avatar
 
Drives: C6Z06 & Gen 5 2SS
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Houston, Texas
Posts: 137
Quote:
Originally Posted by THE EVIL TW1N View Post
i really dont know EXACTLY why, im told the DOHC heads flow better BUT just looking at flow numbers that isnt exactly the case. I think theres more at work than just flow numbers.....its magic......jk but theres probably other characteristics (other than just hard numbers) that make the DOHC better for boost i think.
To say their no different is kinda wrong though, the power levels might be similar but the DOHC's do it with less displacement. Theyre already working on a supercharger for the 5.0 that should put down 520ish RWHP @ only 7psi. I believe a supercharger upgrade for the 6.2 netted someone on here RWHP in the high 400's
You're right, all the warranty-backed LS3 packages seem to be in the high 400's, which I think suggests that's the "safe level" for the stock engine internals (and I think they're also running around 7psi).

This upcoming SC for the 5.0, will Ford offer it as a warranteed package?
thebrander is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-17-2010, 07:33 PM   #3453
thebrander
931HP w/100K mi warranty!
 
thebrander's Avatar
 
Drives: C6Z06 & Gen 5 2SS
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Houston, Texas
Posts: 137
Quote:
Originally Posted by THE EVIL TW1N View Post
most roots/twin screw supeys dont rely on rpms at all and actually lose some boost at higher rpms.
Well there goes that theory. I bet if we were talking cam/bolt-on/tune on this forum, we'd have plenty of experts chime in!!
thebrander is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-17-2010, 07:34 PM   #3454
THE EVIL TW1N
Banned
 
Drives: 2003 Cobra Convertible
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: CA
Posts: 2,925
Quote:
Originally Posted by HIGHOCTANE View Post
Here is another...measely 4.6..actually 284 CI....16.5 psi IIRC(~700 RWHP),...camera managed to record this runsince it was being held...again starting slow in 2nd gear..1st is useless on the street.
I'd LOVE to set my Camaro up the same way..maybe one day.......
if flooring it on the street, do you just start from second gear? anyways I think the Supra 3.0 I6 brought insane power levels to the street and a few years later the 4.6 DOHC made insane power levels attainable to the common adult.

Last edited by THE EVIL TW1N; 04-18-2010 at 01:11 AM.
THE EVIL TW1N is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-17-2010, 07:35 PM   #3455
CLEAN
 
CLEAN's Avatar
 
Drives: '19 Stingray '22 MB GLC 300
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Fort Worth, TX
Posts: 447
Quote:
Originally Posted by NoDak Scotty View Post
OK, I'll take torque over hp but that's just me. So the 5-oh makes great hp but not so much torque as the 6.2?
Don't intend to make this Ford vs Chevy, I am just curious how they get the same power with less cuib inches.
Well the real power of an engine is the torque. HP is basically a mathematical function of where in the powerband the power is made. The LS3 makes more torque than the 5.0, but even though the 5.0 is down 30-40 lb/ft, because it makes it's peak higher up in the band, the math works out to very similar HP's. So to answer your question, the LS3 makes more low end torque, but the 5.0 really comes on higher up. I'm like you though, I'll take low end torque over high end power, simply because I'm always is stop and go traffic.
__________________
"Ever since we got the Camaro, everything seems better"
-My 6 year old daughter
CLEAN is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-17-2010, 07:36 PM   #3456
THE EVIL TW1N
Banned
 
Drives: 2003 Cobra Convertible
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: CA
Posts: 2,925
Quote:
Originally Posted by thebrander View Post
You're right, all the warranty-backed LS3 packages seem to be in the high 400's, which I think suggests that's the "safe level" for the stock engine internals (and I think they're also running around 7psi).

This upcoming SC for the 5.0, will Ford offer it as a warranteed package?
i believe whipple is the one making it and they have their own warranty for the supercharger. Not sure about the engine but we'll see what kinda offerings Ford will have when it finally comes out.
THE EVIL TW1N is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-17-2010, 07:41 PM   #3457
THE EVIL TW1N
Banned
 
Drives: 2003 Cobra Convertible
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: CA
Posts: 2,925
Quote:
Originally Posted by CLEAN View Post
Well the real power of an engine is the torque. HP is basically a mathematical function of where in the powerband the power is made. The LS3 makes more torque than the 5.0, but even though the 5.0 is down 30-40 lb/ft, because it makes it's peak higher up in the band, the math works out to very similar HP's. So to answer your question, the LS3 makes more low end torque, but the 5.0 really comes on higher up. I'm like you though, I'll take low end torque over high end power, simply because I'm always is stop and go traffic.
Low end torque isnt much of an advantage if youre running street tires. Theres only so much of it that is needed at the lower rpms, especially in a lighter car. And if you have a manual tranny car, you can just launch it at the rpm you want. So if you want to launch it at peak torque you can, even if its in the higher rpms.
THE EVIL TW1N is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-17-2010, 07:44 PM   #3458
thebrander
931HP w/100K mi warranty!
 
thebrander's Avatar
 
Drives: C6Z06 & Gen 5 2SS
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Houston, Texas
Posts: 137
Quote:
Originally Posted by THE EVIL TW1N View Post
i believe whipple is the one making it and they have their own warranty for the supercharger. Not sure about the engine but we'll see what kinda offerings Ford will have when it finally comes out.
I don't remember which thread I've already stated this, but it's a nice service Ford provides with their warranteed power upgrades. What's a typical Ford drivetrain warranty?
thebrander is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Tags
2011, 2011 mustang, 442trumpsall, 5.0, camaro, camaro lost!!!, camaro lost., carthatsucks, corvette, drag, fanboys anonymous, ford, ford mustang, glue factory, gluefactory, gt ss ssrs comparison ford, gtss, mustang, numbers, oldnag, race, tired nag, trolls, video


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Camaro VS Mustang Mega Thread Beau Tie Chevy Camaro vs... 3644 03-09-2012 07:45 PM
Gran Turismo 5... No Camaro? 5thGenOwner 5th Gen Camaro SS LS LT General Discussions 111 12-06-2011 10:06 AM
Official 2011 Mustang GT info released nester7929 General Automotive + Other Cars Discussion 81 12-28-2009 03:13 PM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:34 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9 Beta 4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.