Quote:
Originally Posted by Infern0
Thanks for the added transparency. As I'm sure you've seen, a lot of the frustration was with the lack of explanation - though I think most of us assumed the additional dialogue with GM was occurring behind the scenes.
|
It was a tough spot for us, really. We need to stay true to the intention of this section in order for it to succeed, or it could to turn into a customer complaint line: which is exactly the opposite of our intent (Mike, I, or Chevy). We all wanted a new way to learn cool "behind the scenes" stuff about our car.
At the same time, I fully subscribe to the idea that some things are better left out of "committee" in order to get done correctly, and quickly. Especially not while in-process, and I'll never post a play-by-play...these are not always popular moves with the group at large, but it works.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Infern0
Agree. I, and I know Travis at least, would appreciate an opportunity to make sure we get the wording right. We may only get one shot at this one.
|
The question, as phrased in the linked thread will be the formal question. Rest assured, though; they have read everything you guys have said in both threads. So the response will be as all-encompassing as they are willing to get. I guess what I'm saying is we could email them: "ZL1 launching troubles, Go!" and it wouldn't make a lick of difference - they are very familiar with our (the forum) opinions and expectations on this topic.